Journal of Education and Research

Reflections on Variations in PhD Viva Regulations: “And the Options Are …”
Edwin van Teijlingen 1 2 *, Bibha Simkhada 3, Pramod Regmi 1, Padam Simkhada 2 3, Vanora Hundley 1, Krishna C. Poudel 4
More Detail
1 Faculty of Health & Social Sciences, Bournemouth University, UK2 Manmohan Memorial Institute of Health Sciences, Kathmandu, Nepal3 School of Human and Health Sciences, University of Huddersfield, UK4 Institute for Global Health, School of Public Health & Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Amherst, USA* Corresponding Author
Reflective Paper

Journal of Education and Research, Volume 12, Issue 2, 2022, 61-74, https://doi.org/10.51474/jer.v12i2.624

Publication date: Sep 30, 2022

Views: 58 | Downloads: 63

How to cite this article
APA
In-text citation: (van Teijlingen et al., 2022)
Reference: van Teijlingen, E., Simkhada, B., Regmi, P., Simkhada, P., Hundley, V., & Poudel, K. C. (2022). Reflections on Variations in PhD Viva Regulations: “And the Options Are …”. Journal of Education and Research, 12(2), 61-74. https://doi.org/10.51474/jer.v12i2.624
Vancouver
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: van Teijlingen E, Simkhada B, Regmi P, Simkhada P, Hundley V, Poudel KC. Reflections on Variations in PhD Viva Regulations: “And the Options Are …”. Journal of Education and Research. 2022;12(2):61-74. https://doi.org/10.51474/jer.v12i2.624
AMA
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: van Teijlingen E, Simkhada B, Regmi P, Simkhada P, Hundley V, Poudel KC. Reflections on Variations in PhD Viva Regulations: “And the Options Are …”. Journal of Education and Research. 2022;12(2), 61-74. https://doi.org/10.51474/jer.v12i2.624
Chicago
In-text citation: (van Teijlingen et al., 2022)
Reference: van Teijlingen, Edwin, Bibha Simkhada, Pramod Regmi, Padam Simkhada, Vanora Hundley, and Krishna C. Poudel. "Reflections on Variations in PhD Viva Regulations: “And the Options Are …”". Journal of Education and Research 2022 12 no. 2 (2022): 61-74. https://doi.org/10.51474/jer.v12i2.624
Harvard
In-text citation: (van Teijlingen et al., 2022)
Reference: van Teijlingen, E., Simkhada, B., Regmi, P., Simkhada, P., Hundley, V., and Poudel, K. C. (2022). Reflections on Variations in PhD Viva Regulations: “And the Options Are …”. Journal of Education and Research, 12(2), pp. 61-74. https://doi.org/10.51474/jer.v12i2.624
MLA
In-text citation: (van Teijlingen et al., 2022)
Reference: van Teijlingen, Edwin et al. "Reflections on Variations in PhD Viva Regulations: “And the Options Are …”". Journal of Education and Research, vol. 12, no. 2, 2022, pp. 61-74. https://doi.org/10.51474/jer.v12i2.624
ABSTRACT
Getting a PhD is the highest possible education qualification which only a small proportion of all students achieve. As a consequence, examining PhD research in the form of a doctoral thesis is specialist work. This paper highlights the different options that are available for PhD examiners. There are four general options: (1) pass, (2) rewrite and resubmit; (3) lower degree, with or without resubmission; and (4) fail the PhD. However, from our experience, of both being examined for our own PhDs and examining others at a range of different universities, we have noted a considerable variety in detail within these common options. This paper outlines a variety of outcomes of a PhD examination, followed by four short case studies, each reflecting on a particular aspect /differences we experienced as examinees or as examiners. This paper further aims to alert PhD candidates and examiners to study the examination rules set by the awarding university, as the details of the PhD examination outcome, and hence the options available to both examiners and the students may differ more than one might expect.
KEYWORDS
REFERENCES
---
LICENSE