Journal of Education and Research

Journal of Education and Research, Volume 14, Issue 2, 2024, 49-73, https://doi.org/10.51474/jer/17790

Online publication date: Sep 25, 2024

Publication date: Sep 30, 2024

Views: 14 | Downloads: 12

The study examined how learners’ gender affected their performance in a national standardized test in Ghana. Achievement data collected through a census method from 318,254 primary grade 4 learners in 9,619 public schools were used for the study. The instrument for data collection was a standardized test. The data were analyzed using a multilevel modeling technique. The study found significant gender-based differences in mathematics and English achievement, with girls generally performing better. Girls outperformed boys in both subjects in six regions and excelled in English in six others, and boys outperformed girls in mathematics in one region.  The study’s findings confirm gender-based inequalities in learning outcomes in public primary schools, challenging Ghana’s efforts to achieve the set targets of the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goal 4. Therefore, it is imperative for the government, in collaboration with other stakeholders, to implement pragmatic nationwide policies to eliminate the significant gender inequalities in schools. At the same time, teachers must implement gender-re sponsive pedagogies to foster equitable and inclusive learning for all learners.

achievement gender Ghana English language mathematics

1. Azubuike, O. B., Browne, W. J., & Leckie, G. (2024). State and wealth inequalities in foundational literacy and numeracy skills of secondary school-aged children in Nigeria: A multilevel analysis. International Journal of Educational Development, 110, 103112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2024.103112
2. Baron-Cohen, S. (2003). The essential difference: The truth about the male and female brain. Basic Books.
3. Bashir, S., Lockheed, M., Ninan, E., & Tan, J.-P. (2018). Facing forward: Schooling for learning in Africa. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1260-6
4. Blampied, C., Chattopadhyay, S., Greenhill, R., Aziz, I., Ellison, C., Thompson, R., … Salifu, A., (2018). Leaving no one behind in the health and education sectors: An SDG stocktake in Ghana. Overseas Development Institute. https://www.odi.org/sites/odi.org.uk/files/resource-documents/12145.pdf
5. Blatchford, P., & Russell, A. (2021). Rethinking class size: The complex story of impact on teaching and learning. UCL Press
6. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1989). Interacting systems in human development research. Persons in Context, 25–49. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511663949.003
7. Bronfenbrenner, U. (2001). The bioecological theory of human development. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International encyclopaedia of the social and behavioural sciences (pp. 6963–6970). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/b0-08-043076-7/00359-4
8. Bronfenbrenner, U. (2005). Making human beings human: Bioecological perspectives on human development. Sage.
9. Bronfenbrenner, U., & Evans, G. W. (2000). Developmental science in the 21st century: Emerging questions, theoretical models, research designs and empirical findings. Social Development, 9(1), 115–125. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9507.00114
10. Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (2007). The bioecological model of human development. In The handbook of child psychology. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470147658.chpsy0114
11. Christensen, J. (2010). Proposed enhancement of Bronfenbrenner’s development ecology model. Education Inquiry, 1(2), 117–126. https://doi.org/10.3402/edui.v1i2.21936
12. Delaney, J., & Devereux, P. J. (2021). Gender and educational achievement: Stylized facts and causal evidence. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3775979
13. Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (2016). Social role theory of sex differences. In A. Wong, M. Wickramasinghe, R. Hoogland, & N. A. Naples (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell encyclopedia of gender and sexuality studies. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118663219.wbegss183
14. Eriksson, K., & Lindvall, J. (2023). Cultural variation in the ses-gender interaction in student achievement. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1120211. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1120211
15. Finn, J. D. (2019). Academic and non-cognitive effects of small classes. International Journal of Educational Research, 96, 125–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2019.05.006
16. Ghana Statistical Service. (2021). Ghana population and housing census publications. General report volume 3D, literacy and education. Accra.
17. Ghasemi, E., & Burley, H. (2019). Gender, affect, and math: A cross-national meta-analysis of trends in international mathematics and science study 2015 outcomes. Large-Scale Assessments in Education, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-019-0078-1
18. Goldie, P. D., & O’Connor, E. E. (2021). The gender achievement gap: Do teacher–student relationships matter? Psi Chi Journal of Psychological Research, 26(2), 139–149. https://doi.org/10.24839/2325-7342.jn26.2.139
19. Gray, H., Lyth, A., McKenna, C., Stothard, S., Tymms, P., & Copping, L. (2019). Sex differences in variability across nations in reading, Mathematics and science: A meta-analytic extension of baye and Monseur (2016). Large-Scale Assessments in Education, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-019-0070-9
20. Guiso, L., Monte, F., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2008). Culture, gender, and math. Science, 320(5880), 1164–1165. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1154094
21. Halpern, D. F. (2000). Sex differences in cognitive abilities. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
22. Heck, R. H., & Thomas, S. L. (2020). An introduction to multilevel modeling techniques: MLM and SEM approach. Routledge.
23. Hillman, K., O’Grady, E., Rodrigues, S., Schmid, M., & Thomson, S. (2023). Progress in reading literacy study: Australia’s results from PIRLS 2021. https://doi.org/10.37517/978-1-74286-693-2
24. Howie, S. J. (2022). Regional studies in Non-Western countries, and the case of SACMEQ. Springer International Handbooks of Education, 1–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38298-8_18-1
25. Hox, J. J., Moerbeek, M., & van de Schoot, R. (2017). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications. In Quantitative methodology series (3rd ed). Routledge.
26. Hungi, N., Makuwa, D., Ross, K., Saito, M., Dolata, S., Van Cappelle, F., & Vellien, J. (2010). SACMEQ III project result: Pupil achievement levels in reading and mathematics. SACMEQ.
27. Inglehart, R., & Welzel, C. (2005). Modernization, cultural change, and democracy: The human development sequence. Cambridge University Press.
28. Irwin, V., Wang, K., Jung, J., Kessler, E., Tezil, T., Alhassani, S., Filbey, A., Dilig, R., & Bullock Mann, F. (2024). Report on the condition of education 2024 (NCES 2024-144). U.S. Department of Education. https://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2024144
29. Kattan, R. B., Khan, M. M., & Merchant, M. (2023). Achieving gender equality in education: Examining progress and constraints. World Bank Gender Thematic Policy Notes Series.
30. Konstantopoulos, S., & Shen, T. (2023). Class size and teacher effects on non-cognitive outcomes in grades K-3: A fixed effects analysis of ECLS-K:2011 data. Large-Scale Assessments in Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-023-00182-8
31. Laitsch, D., Nguyen, H., & Younghusband, C. H. (2021). Class size and teacher work: Research provided to the BCTF in their struggle to negotiate teacher working conditions. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, 196, 83–101. https://doi.org/10.7202/1078519ar
32. Lei, Z., & Lundberg, S. (2020). Vulnerable boys: Short-term and long-term gender differences in the impacts of adolescent disadvantage. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 178, 424–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2020.07.020
33. Marc Jackman, W., Morrain-Webb, J., & Fuller, C. (2019). Exploring gender differences in achievement through student voice: Critical insights and analyses. Cogent Education, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2019.1567895
34. Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V. S., Foy, P., & Hooper, M. (2016). TIMSS 2015 international results in science. TIMSS and PIRLS. International Study Center, Boston College.
35. Martin, M., Foy, P., Mullis, I. V., & O’Dwyer, L., (2013). Effective schools in reading, mathematics and science at the fourth grade. In TIMSS and PIRLS 2011 Relationships Report (pp. 109–178). TIMSS and PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
36. Meinck, S., & Brese, F. (2019). Trends in gender gaps: Using 20 years of evidence from TIMSS. Large-Scale Assessments in Education, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-019-0076-3
37. Meyer, H., & Benavot, A. (Eds). (2013). PISA, power, and policy: The emergence of global educational governance. Symposium Books Ltd.
38. Ministry of Education. (2015). Inclusive education policy in Ghana.
39. Ministry of Education. (2016). Education sector performance report (ESPR).
40. Ministry of Education. (2018). Ghana education sector analysis. https://www.globalpartnership.org/conten t/ghana-education-sector-analysis-2018
41. Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., & Loveless, T. (2016). 20 years of TIMSS: International trends in mathematics and science achievement, curriculum, and instruction. TIMSS and PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
42. Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M.O., Foy, P., & Drucker, K.T. (2012). PIRLS 2011 international results in reading. TIMSS & PIRLS. International Study Centre, Boston College.
43. Mullis, I. V., & Kelly, D. L. (2022). International achievement in mathematics, science, and reading. Springer International Handbooks of Education, 1243–1271. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88178-8_41
44. Mullis, I. V., & Martin, M. O. (2022). IEA’S TIMSS and PIRLS: Measuring long-term trends in student achievement. Springer International Handbooks of Education, 305–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88178-8_15
45. Murphy, S. (2018). School location and socioeconomic status and patterns of participation and achievement in senior secondary mathematics. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 31(3), 219–235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-018-0251-9
46. National Council for Curriculum and Assessment. (2021). Ghana 2021 national standardized test.Technical report.
47. Newman, B. M., & Newman, P. R. (2022). Bioecological theory. Theories of Human Development, 459–490. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003014980-14
48. Nyatsikor, M. K., Abroampa, W. K. & Esia-Donkoh, K. (2020). The impact of school locale on pupils’ competencies in selected subjects: Does it matter more for specific regions in Ghana? Global Journal of Transformative Education, 2(1) pp 72-85. https://dx.doi.org/10.14434/gjte.v2i1.31174
49. O’Connell, A. A., McCoach, D. B., & Bell, B. A. (2022). Multilevel modeling methods with introductory and advanced applications. Information Age Press.
50. Oberleiter, S., Fries, J., Schock, L. S., Steininger, B., & Pietschnig, J. (2023). Predicting cross-national sex differences in large-scale assessments of students’ reading literacy, mathematics, and science achievement: Evidence from PIRLS and TIMSS. Intelligence, 100, 101784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2023.101784
51. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2021). Education at a glance 2021: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/b35a14e5-en
52. Parker, P. D., Van Zanden, B., & Parker, R. B. (2018). Girls get smart, boys get smug: Historical changes in gender differences in math, literacy, and academic social comparison and achievement. Learning and Instruction, 54, 125–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.09.002
53. Reilly, D. (2023). Gender differences in educational achievement and learning outcomes. In International encyclopedia of education (4th ed., 399–408). https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-818630-5.14051-5
54. Reilly, D., Neumann, D. L., & Andrews, G. (2019). Gender differences in reading and writing achievement: Evidence from the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). American Psychologist, 74(4), 445–458. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000356
55. Retelsdorf, J., Schwartz, K., & Asbrock, F. (2015). “Michael can’t read!” Teachers’ gender stereotypes and boys’ reading self-concept. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(1), 186–194. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037107
56. Rodríguez, S., Regueiro, B., Piñeiro, I., Estévez, I., & Valle, A. (2020). Gender differences in mathematics motivation: Differential Effects on performance in primary education. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03050
57. Rosén, M., Steinmann, I., & Wernersson, I. (2022). Gender differences in school achievement. Springer International Handbooks of Education, 1351–1398. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88178-8_46
58. RTI International. (2015). Ghana 2015 EGRA and EGMA: Report of findings. https://shared.rti.org/content/ghana-2015-egra-and-egma-report-findings
59. Sandsør, A. M. J., & Brevik, L. M. (2024). Gender gaps in English as a second language over time: A shift in favor of boys. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2024.2423151
60. Schleicher, A. (2023). Programme for international student assessment insights and interpretations PISA 2022. OECD.
61. Strietholt, R., & Strello, A. (2022). Socioeconomic inequality in achievement. Springer International Handbooks of Education, 201–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88178-8_11
62. Sudbery, J., & Whittaker, A. (2018). Bronfenbrenner’s ecological model. Human Growth and Development, 287–290. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203730386-13
63. Torppa, M., Eklund, K., Sulkunen, S., Niemi, P., & Ahonen, T. (2017). Why do boys and girls perform differently on PISA Reading in Finland? The effects of reading fluency, achievement behavior, leisure reading, and homework activity. Journal of Research in Reading, 41(1), 122–139. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12103
64. Tudge, J. R., Merçon-Vargas, E. A., & Payir, A. (2022). Urie Bronfenbrenner’s bioecological theory: Its development, core concepts, and critical issues. Sourcebook of Family Theories and Methodologies, 235–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92002-9_16
65. Tudge, J. R., Mokrova, I., Hatfield, B. E., & Karnik, R. B. (2009). Uses and misuses of Bronfenbrenner’s bioecological theory of human development. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 1(4), 198–210. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-2589.2009.00026.x
66. United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2017). Cracking the code: Girls’ and women’s education in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM). International Institute for Educational Planning. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0025/002534/253479E.pdf
67. United Nations Educational Scientific Cultural Organization. (2018). Learning at the bottom of the pyramid: Science, measurement, and policy in low-income countries. International Institute for Educational Planning.
68. van Hek, M., Buchmann, C., & Kraaykamp, G. (2019). Educational systems and gender differences in reading: A comparative multilevel analysis. European Sociological Review, 35(2), 169–186. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcy054
69. van Hek, M., Kraaykamp, G., & Pelzer, B. (2017). Do schools affect girls’ and boys’ reading performance differently? A multilevel study on the gendered effects of school resources and school practices. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 29(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2017.1382540
70. von Davier, M., Kennedy, A., Reynolds, K., Fishbein, B., Khorramdel, L., Aldrich, C., Bookbinder, A., Bezirhan, U., & Yin, L. (2024). TIMSS 2023 international results in mathematics and science. https://doi.org/10.6017/lse.tpisc.timms.rs6460
71. Wang, X. (2024). Gender differences in mathematics achievement across countries and the potential reasons. Proceedings of the 2024 AERA Annual Meeting. https://doi.org/10.3102/2109306
72. Xie, G., & Liu, X. (2023). Gender in mathematics: How gender role perception influences mathematical capability in junior high school. The Journal of Chinese Sociology, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40711-023-00188-3

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.